VII.E. BSC Grievance Procedure: Difference between revisions

From BSC Policy
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


;Harassment:  
;Harassment:  
:A. For the purposes of this policy, harassment will refer to both sexual harassment and other instances of harassment.
:For the purposes of this policy, harassment will refer to both sexual harassment and other instances of harassment.
:B. Unit-level officials are responsible reporters in cases of harassment, sexual misconduct, assault, and other threatening or dangerous behavior that threatens community safety. Unit level officials must forward any and all reports of these incidents to central-level staff.
::A. Unit-level officials are responsible reporters in cases of harassment, sexual misconduct, assault, and other threatening or dangerous behavior that threatens community safety. Unit level officials must forward any and all reports of these incidents to central-level staff.
:C. The BSC will handle all complaints discreetly and will maintain confidentiality to the greatest extent appropriate to the investigation.  
::B. The BSC will handle all complaints discreetly and will maintain confidentiality to the greatest extent appropriate to the investigation.  


;Tier 1: Unit Level Conduct Resolution: This tier of the conduct process is focused on small, manageable conflicts within a unit. The goal of unit level mediation is to empower the units to handle conflicts before they create discomfort in the community. This form of resolution is NOT meant for major conduct policy violations.  
;Tier 1: Unit Level Conduct Resolution: This tier of the conduct process is focused on small, manageable conflicts within a unit. The goal of unit level mediation is to empower the units to handle conflicts before they create discomfort in the community. This form of resolution is NOT meant for major conduct policy violations.  
Line 18: Line 18:
=='''Introduction to the BSC Conduct Process'''==
=='''Introduction to the BSC Conduct Process'''==


:The BSC endeavors to resolve member conduct issues in a manner that respects both the rights of the member(s) alleged to have violated policy and the member(s) who was harmed by the conduct violation. For conflicts that are not clear violations of conduct policy, members should follow the Tier I unit-level conduct resolution steps outlined in this policy. For conduct violations, there are two defined grievance processes: a process for general conduct violations, and a specialized process for any instance involving harassment, sexual misconduct ,physical assault or distribution.  
:The BSC endeavors to resolve member conduct issues in a manner that respects both the rights of the member(s) alleged to have violated policy and the member(s) who was harmed by the conduct violation. For conflicts that are not clear violations of conduct policy, members should follow the Tier I unit-level conduct resolution steps outlined in this policy. For conduct violations, there are two defined grievance processes: a process for general conduct violations, and a specialized process for any instance involving harassment, sexual misconduct, physical assault or distribution.  


=='''Unit Level Conduct Resolution'''==
=='''Unit Level Conduct Resolution'''==
Line 59: Line 59:
::d. The respondent will be notified of their rights in the process along with their rights to appeal
::d. The respondent will be notified of their rights in the process along with their rights to appeal
::e. If in the pre-hearing meeting the respondent BOTH chooses to take responsibility for violating all policies involved in the case AND the hearing officer does not believe a termination of contract should be applied, THEN the respondent can choose between the following two options for case resolution:
::e. If in the pre-hearing meeting the respondent BOTH chooses to take responsibility for violating all policies involved in the case AND the hearing officer does not believe a termination of contract should be applied, THEN the respondent can choose between the following two options for case resolution:
::i. Conditional Contract: The hearing officer and respondent decide on several conditions and/or sanctions that the respondent must complete to successfully resolve the concern. The respondent will sign the agreement at the close of the meeting.
:::i. Conditional Contract: The hearing officer and respondent decide on several conditions and/or sanctions that the respondent must complete to successfully resolve the concern. The respondent will sign the agreement at the close of the meeting.
::ii. Conditional Contract & Restorative Conference: Along with the respondent signing a conditional contract, the respondent may contact the Cooperative Experience Manager to schedule a restorative conference or circle. A BSC Restorative Justice Practitioner will facilitate this restorative process.
:::ii. Conditional Contract & Restorative Conference: Along with the respondent signing a conditional contract, the respondent may contact the Cooperative Experience Manager to schedule a restorative conference or circle. A BSC Restorative Justice Practitioner will facilitate this restorative process.
::f. If the two conditions above are not met, then the case will move on to the Enforcement Committee for review. The respondent will be notified that they have the right to attend this hearing and provide their testimony in person and given a timeline of when the hearing will take place.
::f. If the two conditions above are not met, then the case will move on to the Enforcement Committee for review. The respondent will be notified that they have the right to attend this hearing and provide their testimony in person and given a timeline of when the hearing will take place.
::g. At the close of the hearing the hearing officer will inform the respondent that any retaliation against a supposed complainant, witness, or member of an enforcement committee violates the BSC whistle-blower policy and is a termination worthy offense.
::g. At the close of the hearing the hearing officer will inform the respondent that any retaliation against a supposed complainant, witness, or member of an enforcement committee violates the BSC whistle-blower policy and is a termination worthy offense.

Revision as of 16:24, 15 June 2017

Definitions

Enforcement Committee
The Enforcement Committee shall refer to the investigating committee, which may either be the Conduct Committee or the Cabinet. For harassment cases, the enforcement committee will be the Cooperative Experience manager, Conduct Member Advisor and the Conduct Chair.
Enforcement Committee Chair
The Enforcement Committee Chair is either the Concom Chair or President, depending on the Enforcement Committee.
Hearing Officer
The hearing officer, will perform a preliminary assessment of the conduct complaint, which shall include consulting with the complainant if additional information is needed. The hearing officer is the Cooperative Experience Manager or a designee of the Executive Director.
Harassment
For the purposes of this policy, harassment will refer to both sexual harassment and other instances of harassment.
A. Unit-level officials are responsible reporters in cases of harassment, sexual misconduct, assault, and other threatening or dangerous behavior that threatens community safety. Unit level officials must forward any and all reports of these incidents to central-level staff.
B. The BSC will handle all complaints discreetly and will maintain confidentiality to the greatest extent appropriate to the investigation.
Tier 1
Unit Level Conduct Resolution: This tier of the conduct process is focused on small, manageable conflicts within a unit. The goal of unit level mediation is to empower the units to handle conflicts before they create discomfort in the community. This form of resolution is NOT meant for major conduct policy violations.
Tier 2
General Conduct Violation Process: This tier of the conduct process is focused on conduct policy violations. The goal of this process is to resolve conduct violations at the central level.
Tier 3
Conduct Violation Process for Harassment, Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, Physical Assault and Distribution: This tier of the conduct process focuses on only the violations mentioned above. These complaints will take priority over other cases due to the severity of the conduct policy violations.

Introduction to the BSC Conduct Process

The BSC endeavors to resolve member conduct issues in a manner that respects both the rights of the member(s) alleged to have violated policy and the member(s) who was harmed by the conduct violation. For conflicts that are not clear violations of conduct policy, members should follow the Tier I unit-level conduct resolution steps outlined in this policy. For conduct violations, there are two defined grievance processes: a process for general conduct violations, and a specialized process for any instance involving harassment, sexual misconduct, physical assault or distribution.

Unit Level Conduct Resolution

Units are encouraged to mediate smaller conflicts between members to prevent more serious future policy violations. If a member violates BSC policy, conduct complaints should be reported through the BSC Conduct Complaint Form. If a member is a possible threat to themselves or others, the Cooperative Experience Manager, the Executive Director, and/or the Member Resource Supervisor must be informed within 24 hours.

1. Members are encouraged to talk to the member they believe is engaging in problematic behavior about the conflict. The Cooperative Experience Manager can provide resources such as a mediation chart, assistance from a BSC Restorative Justice Practitioner, and/or outside mediators. Members are encouraged to reach out to their house presidents and managers for support. Both these managers have been trained in mediation.
2. If the conflict continues, managers may issue warnings to members causing conflict. Warnings must be documented by email. Managers are also encouraged to speak to members about the warning.
3. If a member continues to cause conflict, managers can issue a required workshift fine, a required housemate/roommate agreement form, or another required engagement that will appropriately address the conflict.
4. If the conflict continues despite these attempts to resolve the issue at the unit-level, a formal complaint must be submitted through the BSC Conduct Complaint Form.

General Conduct Violation Process

1. Collection of Complainant Report(s): A report of the complainant’s concern(s) is submitted through the BSC Conduct Complaint Form. submitted through the BSC Conduct Complaint Form. The complainant is notified through the form of their rights in the process and encouraged to utilize the Conduct Member Advisor as a resource.
2. Pre-Hearing: If the hearing officer deems the complaint to be substantive, a pre-hearing meeting will be conducted, where the respondent will meet with staff to review the allegations and will get a chance to take responsibility for the violations and resolve the concern. If the staff member involved and the respondent agree upon a conditional contract addressing the concerns, the case does not need to proceed to an enforcement committee.
3. Enforcement Committee Hearing: If the respondent does not accept responsibility for the violation and agree to the assigned sanctions in the pre-hearing or the complaint is significant enough to warrant potential termination of contract, the case will move on to an Enforcement Committee hearing where the case outcome will be decided by a body of current BSC members.
1. Collection of Complainant Report(s)
The BSC encourages members to report instances of conduct violations in order to promote a cooperative living environment. In order for the BSC to respond efficiently, the following information will be collected from the complainant:
a. Required Information
i. Name of the complainant;
ii. Who is named as having engaged in the inappropriate conduct;
iii. What specific behavior or comments occurred;
iv. Where did it occur;
v. When did it occur;
vi. What was the response at the time, if any;
vii. Names of the witnesses, if any, and
viii. Whether this incident of inappropriate conduct is part of a pattern of behavior and, if so, the same information regarding previous incidents.
b. The Complaint Intake Process
i. The Cooperative Experience Manager or a designee of the Executive Director, as appropriate, is responsible for ensuring that the above information is submitted through the BSC Conduct Complaint Form. The complaint form will notify the complainant of their rights in the conduct process, including that:
a. The Conduct Member Advisor is available to assist them in navigating the process and collecting witness statements
b. The complainant may recommend sanctions for the respondent that the Conduct Committee will consider.
ii. The Cooperative Experience Manager or designee of the Executive Director will follow up with the complainant in a timely manner to confirm receipt of the complaint and inform them of the next steps in the process.
iii. Staff also should ask whether the complainant would be willing to participate in a restorative conference or circle.
iv. The complainant’s submitted statement will then be reviewed by the hearing officer.
v. Any individuals with potential conflicts of interest will be excused from the decision-making process, and the Executive Director will designate a replacement(s).
vi. The Cooperative Experience Manager or a designee of the Executive Director will determine if the case should move on to the conduct process or be dismissed.
vii. Following the filing of the initial complaint, the Conduct Member Advisor will aid the complainant and respondent in understanding their right to provide testimony, and in collecting witness statements for the hearing(s). Any updates for complainants involved will be communicated by the hearing officer or Conduct Member Advisor.
2. Pre-Hearing Meeting with Respondent
a. The hearing officer will schedule a pre-hearing meeting with the respondent, where they will privately inform the respondent of the complaint, review their rights in the conduct process, review the alleged policy violations/charges involved in the case, and give the respondent the opportunity to respond to the allegations.
b. The respondent will be notified of this meeting and the charges/ alleged policy violations at least 72 hours in advance. The respondent will be notified by email and then reminded by phone/text if they have not responded to the initial email. If they do not attend, the case will automatically be sent to the Enforcement Committee for review.
c. If the respondent requests it, the complainant’s testimony can be provided to them at the pre-hearing meeting.
d. The respondent will be notified of their rights in the process along with their rights to appeal
e. If in the pre-hearing meeting the respondent BOTH chooses to take responsibility for violating all policies involved in the case AND the hearing officer does not believe a termination of contract should be applied, THEN the respondent can choose between the following two options for case resolution:
i. Conditional Contract: The hearing officer and respondent decide on several conditions and/or sanctions that the respondent must complete to successfully resolve the concern. The respondent will sign the agreement at the close of the meeting.
ii. Conditional Contract & Restorative Conference: Along with the respondent signing a conditional contract, the respondent may contact the Cooperative Experience Manager to schedule a restorative conference or circle. A BSC Restorative Justice Practitioner will facilitate this restorative process.
f. If the two conditions above are not met, then the case will move on to the Enforcement Committee for review. The respondent will be notified that they have the right to attend this hearing and provide their testimony in person and given a timeline of when the hearing will take place.
g. At the close of the hearing the hearing officer will inform the respondent that any retaliation against a supposed complainant, witness, or member of an enforcement committee violates the BSC whistle-blower policy and is a termination worthy offense.
3. The Enforcement Committee Hearing
a. Following the pre-hearing, the Conduct Member Advisor will contact the respondent to assist in collecting witness statements. Only the statements of witnesses to the incident(s) involved in the case will be considered. The Conduct Committee can decide whether to exclude a witness statement from the hearing if it is too long or not relevant to the case.
b. The respondent will be notified of the Enforcement Committee meeting and the charges/ alleged policy violations 72 hours in advance of the hearing. If they do not attend, a decision on the case will be made in their absence.
c. Only members of the Enforcement Committee (including the Chair, Administrative Assistant, and staff advisors), the Conduct Member Advisor, and the respondent may attend the hearing.
d. The entire Enforcement Committee proceeding shall be held in executive session.
e. Before the respondent is let into to the room, the Conduct Committee Chair will present some basic details of the case to the committee, including the alleged policy violations. The Conduct Committee will:
i. Read the complainant’s report and witness statements
ii. Disclose potential conflicts of interest. The Conduct Committee member who believes they may have a conflict of interest should discuss the circumstances privately with the Conduct Committee Chair. Collectively, they will decide if the Conduct Committee member should participate in the hearing.
iii. The Conduct Committee should vote on whether the respondent is responsible or not responsible for violating each individual policy in the case. Then the committee should assign relevant educational or punitive sanctions.
iv. The Enforcement Committee may only take action on allegations specified in the report using only the evidence presented at the hearing.
v. The Cooperative Experience Manager or other professional staff advisor to the Enforcement Committee should inform the committee if they believe the decision made is problematic based on risk or past precedent. If this is the case, the Committee must review the materials again and vote for a second time on the outcome of the case. After this second vote, if the Cooperative Experience Manager/staff advisor or Enforcement Committee Chair still feel the decision is not appropriate, they may announce that they will refer the decision to the Termination Appeals Body for review. In such circumstances, the Enforcement Committee decision is not official until approved by the Terminations Appeal Body.
f. The Enforcement Committee Chair shall notify the respondent and complainant of the outcome of the case in writing within 48 hours of the hearing. The respondent’s notification should include information on the appeals process.
g. The Cooperative Experience Manager/staff advisor, or their their designee, is charged with ensuring that the committee’s decision is implemented. If appropriate, this may include notifying unit-level management of the hearing’s outcome.
h. The Conduct Member Advisor will follow-up with the respondent to ensure they understand the decision and their rights to appeal.
 The Conduct Member Advisor will also follow up with the complainant to check in and process the outcome with them.

Conduct Process Involving Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and Sexual Violence, Discrimination, Physical Assault, and Distribution

[Board Approved 12/8/11] [Conduct Investigator Revisions Approved 02/16/12]